@article{oai:sucra.repo.nii.ac.jp:00013977,
 author = {山村, 賢明},
 journal = {教育社会学研究, The journal of educational sociology},
 month = {},
 note = {The social mobility in industrial society might be brought about by various factors. However, there must be at least social norms which positively approve the mobility on the cultural level. And also there must be socialization process which internalizes those norms and makes members of society mobility-oriented. The deferred gratification theory can get meaning in this context. Though they have much wider perspectives than social mobility, researches on "achievement motivation" by McClelland and his associates focuses more directly on the personality factor in mobility. The researches of that type in Japan such as by Profs. Hayashi and, Yasuda, however, don't seem to coincide with McClelland's anticipation and results. I think the main reason for this is the concept of achievement motivation itself should be bound by American culture. As the concept is based on the individualistic and self-assertive culture of highly competitive American society, it could easily be correlated with independence and self-reliance training. But culture like Japanese which has non-individualistic and so to say "other-involving" orientation, and "passive socialization" as well as appreciation of "amae" relationship in that culture, might show the possibility of achievement (motivation). that doesn't necessarily associate with independence training. Then I proposed that such weakness of psychological study of achievement motivation should be offset by the sociological approach to the motivation as C. W. Mills suggests. From this position, the study of mobility motivation as the consequence of socialization will be considered more productive., rights: 日本教育社会学会
rights: 本文データは学協会の許諾に基づきCiNiiから複製したものである
relation: IsVersionOf: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110001877476/, text, application/pdf},
 pages = {29--44},
 title = {社会移動と子どもの社会化 : 達成動機の問題を中心にして},
 volume = {24},
 year = {1969}
}