@article{oai:sucra.repo.nii.ac.jp:00017632,
 author = {吉田, 学 and 牛江, 一裕},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {埼玉大学紀要. 教育学部, Journal of Saitama University. Faculty of Education},
 month = {},
 note = {In our previous paper, we outlined some cases in which traditional syntactic approaches fail to handle the passivization of some kinds of verbs: pseudopassives, double object verbs, Experiencer-object (EO) psych verbs, and symmetric verbs. In this paper, we propose an alternative way to explain passivization focusing mainly on argument structure of verbs rather than exclusively on the syntactic structure that a verb takes. We assume that passivization is an operation that takes place in the lexicon, that is, before syntax, and therefore we may enjoy a passivization principle that is insensitive to syntactic differences. By identifying passivization with the lexical approach that we propose, we may give a unified explanation to the problematic cases for the syntactic approaches., text, application/pdf},
 pages = {45--72},
 title = {Lexical Passivization (2) : An Approach Based on Argument Structure<人文・社会科学>},
 volume = {61},
 year = {2012},
 yomi = {ヨシダ, マナブ and ウシエ, カズヒロ}
}