@article{oai:sucra.repo.nii.ac.jp:00018140,
 author = {李, 潔},
 journal = {社会科学論集, SHAKAIKAGAKU－RONSHU (The Social Science Review)},
 month = {},
 note = {Among the G20 countries, major developed countries mainly utilize the double deflation method to calculate real value added, while China and India utilize the single deflation method. Calculation using the double deflation method requires frequently published input-output data and detailed price indices, giving rise to many practical difficulties. The System of National Accounts (SNA, 2008) suggests the single deflation method as an alternative solution.
Using the input-output framework, this paper considers the relationship between the relative price change between industries and the bias caused by single deflation. Based on the results of that consideration and past experience of verification, the impact of bias caused by single deflation method on China’s GDP growthwas empirically analyzed using input-output data, GDP deflators, and Producer Price Indices for Industrial Products.
In the post verification based on the period 1960-2000 in Japan, compiled by the author, primary industry and much of secondary industry areintermediate-goodsindustries, and almost all tertiary industries are final-goodsindustries. As a trend, with economic growth, the prices of primary industry and secondary industry products will show a relative decrease, and prices in the tertiary industry will show a relative increase due to the rise in labor element prices. Therefore, the price of intermediategoods showed a relative decrease, the price of finalgoods showed a relative increase, and accordingly the GDP growth calculated using the single deflation method was overestimated. However, Alexander, et al. (2017) did not obtain a clear trend in the verification for the eight G20 developed countries after 2000.
The main conclusions obtained from the empirical analysis for the four periods of 2002-2005, 2005-2007, 2007-2010, and 2010-2012 in China are as follows. 
Unlike the period 1960-2000 in Japan, the characteristics of intermediate goods in secondary industries are not strong, and many tertiary industries have several of the characteristics of intermediate goods, especially in the first two periods. Therefore, despite tertiary industry pricesshowing a relative rise in the four periods in China, as in Japan during the period 1960-2000, the risein prices of intermediate goods was larger than that of final goods. Thus, China's GDP growth is underestimated when calculatedusing the single deflation method. In other words, a tendency opposite to that of Japan in the period 1960-2000 was observed in this study., 1.　はじめに
2.　これまでの研究経緯
3.　シングルデフレーション法のバイアスについて
　3-1.　Alexander らによるシングルデフレーション法のバイアスに関する概念整理
　3-2.　投入産出フレームワークによるバイアスの考察
4.　中国におけるシングルデフレーション法のバイアスに関する実証分析
　4-1．利用する産業連関統計と産出デフレーターについて
　4-2．中国2002－ 2007年についての検証結果
　4-3．中国2007－ 2012年についての検証結果
5.　おわりに, text, application/pdf},
 pages = {61--72},
 title = {実質付加価値のアプローチに関する考察 : 中国産業連関表による検証を含めて《論文》},
 volume = {152・153合併号},
 year = {2018}
}