@article{oai:sucra.repo.nii.ac.jp:00018347,
 author = {首藤, 敏元 and 二宮, 克美 and 杉山, 佳菜子},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {埼玉大学紀要. 教育学部, Journal of Saitama University. Faculty of Education},
 month = {},
 note = {We should makes a decision by taking into account both the individual’s right to pursue own demand and his/her obligation as a member of the group. We investigated such judgments (termed “personal -moral judgments”) concerning a choice between realizing the happiness of one’s family through self-sacrifice and achieving personal happiness by prioritizing self-interest, in a conflict between one’s own and one’s family’s desires. A total of 615 Japanese citizens participated in this study (248 university students in their 20s, 160 adults in their 30s, and 207 adults in their 50s). Fourteen stories that described family conflicts were presented and participants judged the degree of importance of the agent decision, the sense of duty involved in self-sacrifice (in the self-sacrifice scenario), the right of self-determination to serve his/her own interests (self-serving scenario), feeling of satisfaction of the agent after the decision, and their own empathy with the decision of the agent in each story. As results of ANOVA for each of 4 judgments, it was found that “father/husband” was more strongly associated with the duty of self-sacrifice than with the right to pursue self-interest, and the right to pursue self-interest was more strongly associated with “woman/child,” than the obligation of self-sacrifice was. Undeniably, morality develop in the cultural context. However, the present results revealed that the cultural attributes, on the basis of cultural-psychological perspectives, may not uniformly influence moral judgments., text, application/pdf},
 pages = {109--124},
 title = {Japanese Adults’ Personal-Moral Judgments on Self-Priority/Sacrifice Solutions for Family Conflicts<教育科学>},
 volume = {67},
 year = {2018},
 yomi = {シュトウ, トシモト and ニノミヤ, カツミ and スギヤマ, カナコ}
}