@article{oai:sucra.repo.nii.ac.jp:00018755,
 author = {松原, 朋世 and 山田, 純夢 and 熊倉, 大地 and 向山, 侑佳 and 中下, 富子 and 池田, 英二},
 issue = {2},
 journal = {埼玉大学紀要. 教育学部, Journal of Saitama University. Faculty of Education},
 month = {},
 note = {It is reported that the proponent prefers fair distribution to the receiver in the money distribution experiment using the Ultimatum Game. In this research, the proponent is the proponent when the receiver compares with the adult and the child and prefers an equitable proposal, why he made the proposal, and when comparing the Ultimatum Game and the Dictator Game. The purpose was to clarify what kind of money distribution would be made. Twenty male university students acted as a proposer and asked them to work on an experimental task. As a result of analysis of variance, the distribution amount of money when the recipients were adults and children was significantly higher in children than adults (p<.0286). In addition, the distribution amount of money when the type of the game is the Ultimatum Game and the Dictator Game is significantly higher in the Ultimatum Game than in the Dictator Game (p<.0324). As a result of the experiment, it was suggested that the university student gave more money to the children than the adults, and that the university students have fairness for the children whose position is weaker than their own. Also, even if the proposer is a university student, as in the previous research, money was distributed so that each other would be fair in the Ultimatum Game., text, application/pdf},
 pages = {409--417},
 title = {大学生における対大人と対子どもの公正さ : 最後通牒ゲーム・独裁者ゲームを通して<人文・社会科学>},
 volume = {68},
 year = {2019},
 yomi = {マツバラ, トモヨ and ヤマダ, ジュンナ and クマクラ, ダイチ and ムカイヤマ, ユカ and ナカシタ, トミコ and イケダ, エイジ}
}